v1.0.4

Don't ape
into rugs.

Paste any token contract. In seconds you get a LOW RISK / RISKY / DANGER verdict and the exact red flags — mint and freeze authority, whale wallets, honeypot patterns — in plain English. Before you buy, not after.

mintguardian : ~$ log --flagged

Flagged, then rescanned.

scannedtokenverdictcontract
$cavyRISKY55
one wallet held 51.4% of supply[ ]day 8: rescanned RISKY 62 · sell quote returned no route
$RABRAPRISKY55
one wallet held 50.5% of supply[ ]day 11: rescanned RISKY 62 · no pair on DexScreener

Every row is a real scan — tap an address to verify it yourself. Outcomes are from our own rescans; misses stay on the board.

mintguardian : ~$ explain --verdict

One paste. Everything that matters.

Example verdict, shown in English.

mintguardian : ~$ result --score 67

SOLANAMEW1…cPP501
cat in a dogs world · MEW
Verdict
[ RISKY ]CAUTION02

Proceed with caution. Review the risks first.

SAFETY SCORE
Severity
RISKY
Data confidence03
90%
Risks
1 found
Analysis04

This token receives a RISKY verdict because a large share of supply is held by a small number of wallets, even after filtering out the identified liquidity pool. The mint controls themselves are clean — freeze and mint authorities are revoked, and no transfer hook or permanent delegate is set — but this scan did not evaluate whether liquidity is locked or whether the market is deep enough to sell into.

×Highly concentrated token supplyHIGH

The top 10 wallets hold 64.26% of total supply after excluding the identified liquidity pool, and the single largest wallet holds 36.16% alone. No check was performed on whether that top wallet's position is locked. On Solana only the largest 20 accounts are visible, so the full holder distribution is unknown. This concentration means a few holders could move the price sharply if they sell.

[ ]Outside this scan: LP lock, exit routeLOW

This scan did not measure: whether the liquidity is locked; whether there is a market deep enough to sell into. These are not reflected in the score or the verdict.

The absence of a detected signal does not prove safety, and a scanner that never admits a gap is hiding one.

  • Liquidity lock and sellability are not measured on Solana.
  • Risk signals describe what a contract can do, not what its creator intends to do.
  • A token with no history cannot be certified safe, however clean the contract.
  1. Address and chainCopy any token address from a chat, an explorer, or your wallet. The chain — Solana or EVM — is auto-detected.
  2. Verdict and scoreLive on-chain state — mint and freeze authority, whale wallets, contract and trading flags — scored by a deterministic rule engine. The score and the verdict are computed in code, not guessed.
  3. Data confidenceThe share of checked signals for which data was actually obtained.
  4. AnalysisA clear LOW RISK / RISKY / DANGER call with a 0–100 score and the specific red flags. A language model writes the explanation — it never decides the verdict.

What it catches

mintguardian : ~$ why --mobile

Built for where you actually trade.

Memecoins move in group chats, on phones, in minutes. Every other scanner lives in a browser tab or a Telegram bot. MintGuardian is a native app: copy an address from the chat, paste, read the verdict, share the card back — without leaving your phone.

mintguardian : ~$ features --list

mintguardian : ~$ chains --list

Six chains. One paste.

mintguardian : ~$ watch --status

Know before they pull it.

Add a token to your watchlist and get a push the moment its mint, freeze or owner authority changes hands. BETA — expanding.

mintguardian : ~$ pricing

> Get MintGuardian

One avoided rug pays for years of Premium.

Free: 25 scans a day with an account. No card, no wallet.

Premium — $4.99/month or $34.99/year: unlimited scans, unlimited watchlist, full history. Same verdict engine on every plan; Premium buys volume and alerts, not different answers.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play